• Marc Kroop

Maximizing The Settlement Value Of Your Wrongful Termination Claim

Even in the most egregious wrongful termination and discrimination cases, employers still have a significant opportunity to reduce liability and avoid paying a large settlement amount to an aggrieved employee. This is true, even when it is clear that the employee is going to prevail in their claim of wrongful termination or discrimination.


In an egregious case, where the employer's liability is clear, the employer can make what is known as an "unconditional offer of reinstatement" to the employee. Such an offer, places an employee, who has suffered egregious discrimination, harassment, abuse or illegal working conditions, in a very difficult situation.


If the employee accepts the unconditional offer of reinstatement, the employee is free to return to work and still pursue their employment claim against the employer. However, the fact that the employee is now gainfully employed, reduces, significantly, the economic value of the employee's claim. In addition, it places the employee in the unbearably difficult position of having to pursue claims against a current employer, while still working with co-workers and supervisors that are not supportive of the employee's claims. This can create even more animosity and tension at work.


The outlook is not much better for an employee who rejects an unconditional offer of reinstatement. In that case, the employee may still pursue their claim, but will be doing so, while losing income on a daily basis and facing an employer in a lawsuit that can now argue successfully that damages are severely limited. The employer can assert that any economic losses suffered by the employee, going forward, are the fault of the employee, who refused to return to work. Once an employee's economic damages are cut off, due to a rejected unconditional offer of reinstatement (usually at a time very early in the case), the economic risk of going forward with the case is substantially increased for the employee.


In many cases, we have been successful in maximizing our clients' recoveries even after an unconditional offer of reinstatement is made. In some cases, our clients may immediately find alternative work or they may receive a note from their physician allowing for time off work on disability that alleviates the immediate need to deal with the employer's unconditional offer of reinstatement.


However, where our client has not found a new job or is not disabled from working, but is instead, stressed, anxious, depressed or afraid to return to work, we have, in those cases, utilized other means to determine the legitimacy of the employer's unconditional offer of reinstatement. In those cases, we have still be able to maximize a negotiated result for our employee client.


For example, in a recent case we handled, our client was fired due to her request for a medical leave of absence. The termination was in writing and falsely stated that our client had no right to the medical leave. It was a simple case, until we received an unconditional offer of reinstatement, within 30 days of our client's termination.


At that time, rather than risk damaging her case by rejecting the offer outright, we encouraged our client to let us explore her return to work with the employer and find out if it was in fact a legitimate offer. Our client accepted our advice and allowed us to proceed, even though she had no actual intention of returning to work in a job where she was mistreated.


We wrote the employer's counsel and requested a meeting to discuss a number of accommodations for our client including (1) additional time off work on an intermittent basis; (2) modified start times to allow our client to adjust to her new medication; (3) assurances regarding no further discrimination; (4) complete separation from the supervisor who had been harassing her on the basis of her disability.


By sending those requests for accommodation, we were able to determine that the offer of reinstatement made by the employer was not a real offer. The employer had not provided our client with the initial accommodation she requested and had even less interest in providing the future accommodations for her that we were requesting.


In this case, the employer immediately agreed to mediate the case, prior to our client's potential return to work. We were able to resolve the case for $175,000.00 within a a few short months. The settlement was an excellent result considering that our failure to resolve the case may have necessitated our client damaging her case by rejecting an offer to return to work or her actual return to her former position, in a very hostile work environment, in order to continue to pursue her claims.


Had we simply rejected the unconditional offer of reinstatement, as was our client's initial desire, it is doubtful we could have even achieved a $50,000.00 result. There would have been no damages to speak of based upon the three and a half weeks she had been out of work prior to the employer's unconditional offer of reinstatement. In mediation, that fact would have significantly undercut any claim our client had for damages and limited her recovery. Our strategy effectively delayed the employer's reinstatement offer until after we could determine if the case was resolvable. Once we resolved the case, reinstatement was no longer an issue.


When you are seeking to maximize the value of a settlement, it is helpful to have experienced counsel who can help you navigate your employer's defenses. Kroop Labor Law's managing attorney, Marc G. Kroop, has successfully resolved over 500 employment cases in his legal career. Kroop Labor Law provides you with a direct line to speak with Mr. Kroop (925) 989-8264. Alternatively you may email us at info@krooplaborlaw.com We will immediately respond to your employment concerns in writing.




W

kroop labor law

Copyright Kroop Labor Law 2018

PRIVACY POLICY

This privacy policy constitutes the privacy practices for krooplaborlaw.com. This privacy policy applies only to information submitted to this website and includes the following information:
1. What personally identifiable information is collected from you through the website, how it is used and with whom it may be shared.
2. What choices are available to you regarding the use of your data.
3. The security procedures in place to protect the misuse of your information.
4. How you can correct any inaccuracies in the information.

Information Collection, Use, and Sharing

We are the sole owners of the information collected on this site. We only have access to/collect information that you voluntarily provide us by email or our contact form. We will not voluntarily sell, rent or otherwise provide this information to anyone outside of our office.
We will only use information provided by you to respond to you and or set up a free initial case consultation. We will not voluntarily share your information with any third party outside of our organization, other than as necessary to fulfill your request for us to contact you. 

Unless you ask us not to, we may contact you via email in the future to tell you about our services or changes to this privacy policy.

Your Access to and Control Over Information 

You may opt out of any future contacts from us at any time. You can do the following at any time by contacting us via the email address or phone number given on our website:

See what data we have about you, if any.
Change/correct any data we have about you.
Have us delete any data we have about you.
Express any concern you have about our use of your data.

Security 

We take precautions to protect your information. When you submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected both online and offline.

If you feel that we are not abiding by this privacy policy, you should contact us immediately via telephone at (925) 989-8264 or via email info@krooplaborlaw.com.

TERMS OF USE

Informational Purposes - This web site and the content have been prepared by Kroop Labor Law for informational purposes only and in no way constitutes legal advice. Kroop Labor Law designed this web site to provide general helpful information about California and Federal law to members of the public in need of an attorney licensed to practice in the State of California.

No Attorney Client Relationship - The use of this web site, and the sending or receipt of information does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Kroop Labor Law.  Any agreement to represent you must be in writing and include the material terms of our representation.

Confidentiality - Communication with Kroop Labor Law through this web site is both privileged or confidential as are any future contacts with our firm.

Advertisement/Marketing - This web site is a California Electronic Media Advertisement. This website is not an advertisement or solicitation for business outside the state of California. Our practice solely limited to California and federal cases. We will not undertake the representation of any person who resides in a state where this web site fails to comply with state or local rules for marketing or advertising material.

Links - Any link from this web site to the web site of a private, governmental, educational, or other non-profit entity's web page is for informational purposes only.  Such link is provided for your convenience and is not meant to state or imply the existence of a relationship between Kroop Labor Law and that entity.

Seek Legal Counsel -  You should not act on your own upon any information contained on this web site or any other web site without first seeking the assistance of qualified legal counsel who can assist you with your legal matter.